MUHAMMAD ZAFAR IQBAL versus OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED (OGDCL)
Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Civil Service Petitioners were employees of a state-owned company and sought the impression that the respondent company should protect the applicants in the placement of their grades and that the defendant would pay the company money from his salary. Stop Recovery And the refund of the recovered amount was also the result of the initial publicity of the applicants from receipt of the questioned by the approved applicants and said that the promotion has benefited the applicants. Rehabilitation in isolation cannot be taken for granted. And, as such, it cannot be said as unfair retrieval, because the initial promotion of the applicants was in their best interest and the adjustment to the applicants' salaries and allowances was a consequential and necessary requirement, neither attracted the principles of the locus. What. Neither the punitiveness nor the isolation can be achieved until the benefits of development have been directed by the High Court to consider the applicants' cases in a definitive manner and they can be developed if the applicants meet the criteria. The constitutional request was dealt with,
