NAZAR MUHAMMAD QURESHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
Article 199 Regarding the standard of constitutional jurisdiction's recruitment policy, applicants were convinced of the change in the selection criteria by the government regarding the selection of officials for a UN peacekeeping mission. If the government itself did not support any law or rule, or it was discriminatory, then the High Court had the authority to investigate the same by sending the government to a UN peacekeeping mission. If the government had decided to send officers, then there was no chance of fair competition, irrespective of whether any officer was a repeater or a fresh candidate, though the United Nations, on the standard. It was argued that if the government's objection was to change the policy, then the re- It should be given. The opportunity for fresh candidates, then, should improve the quality of education and training provided to police officers, and under constitutional jurisdiction, opportunity cannot be afforded by depriving others of the competition. Under the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court declared the latest policy letter / guidelines of the government illegal and void. Applicants eligible to appear in the exam will be entitled to take part in the competition, according to the criteria set by the UN peacekeeping operations, under which the petition was granted