Article 42 and Contract 54 Contract Act (IX of 72 1872), Declaration and Order of Selling and Contract of Sale Contracting suit for a contractual agreement, the plaintiff asserting his or her claim of right That the receipt of the sale by the defendant is registered. Forward the contract of sale between the seller and the defendant in question, while the registered sale deed was executed between the seller and the defendant, and the buyer mentioned in the contract of sale was a different person other than the plaintiff, Not mentioned anywhere. The same was carried forward or as a result of the contract, therefore, the sale agreement was not a result of the contract even if the sale agreement was executed under the sale agreement, in accordance with Article 62 of the contract. Act, 1872, after the enactment of the registered sale deed, it did not require the performance of the Ness and the sale agreement had no binding effect and the plaintiff could not ask for relief in any of the two courts below. The trial was not subject to a judicial defect, nor was it the result of misreading and the reading of evidence, and the plaintiff did not demand interference. Any unlawful interference, irregularity or permanent error in court decisions that guarantees the interference of the High Court in its amended jurisdiction
