Find a Lawyer

KINGCRETE BUILDERS versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE

Section 18 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Concrete Transit Mixers (CTM) Imported by the National Highways Notice Requests Short Payment Duty on the request of such CCTM Petitioner on such CCTM 5 ad aid valorum duty (which was already paid) is payable, and it is demanded by invalid notice that not 65%, as per section RO 1090 (I) / 2006, dated 1 11 2006, c. Only 2500 units of TM were allowed to import @ 5% on first come and first serve basis. The applicant imported and cleared CTMs on 22 9 2006. And, when the duty rate was 65 Section. Section RO 1090 (I) / 2006 was effective from 1 11 2006 and did not provide a taxable duty of 65% on such CTMs. There was no reduction in its import and release by Section RO 1090 (I) / 2006 High r \ nHigh Court dismissed constitutional application.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• M. N. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 85
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS alias QARI JAMIL v. FEDERAL REVIEW BOARD through Secretary, Supreme Court Building, Islamabad 2013 MLD 87
• NAZAR MUHAMMAD QURESHI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior 2013 PLC(CS) 99
• SANYA SAUD v. Khawaja SAUD MASUD 2013 CLC 108
• Dr. Raja MUHAMMAD KAMRAN v. SHAHEER CONSTRUCTIONS through Rao Naveed Aftab (Partner) 2013 MLD 118
• ZAFAR MEHMOOD KHOKHAR v. Dr. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 2013 PLD 121
• SAIMA AMBREEN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division Government of Pakistan 2013 PLC(CS) 133
• MUHAMMAD YASEEN v. SSP ISLAMABAD 2013 PCrLJ 137

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

tax advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes