MUHAMMAD RAMZAN KATIAR versus PAKISTAN REFINERY LTD.
Sections 60, 83 and 99 of the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 litigation declaration, order restraint and settlement of money Accordingly, the plaintiff's recovery was contracted by the Cantonment Board and deposited on imported articles for use, use or sale within the limits of the Cantonment Board. The relevant plaintiff was an oil refinery and refused to import crude oil from abroad. ? Pay Zukor Tori on the basis that oil was supplied through underground pipelines. The volatility octroi tax was not the same as the toll tax so that it could be levied on road or bridge entrances but the tax was not only imposed on the importation or entry of goods within any limits. It was of no importance for the sale, consumption or importation of only crude oil used in such ranges so that the entry of crude oil into the boundaries of octroi was inserted to attract the price of oil. For example, it would be safe if the same land was brought through pipelines or by road, etc., but the defendant took advantage of the treatment provided under section 99A of the Cantonment Act, 1924, but without success. In response to a pending notification, which has since been issued in favor of the respondent. Under the provisions of the same law, therefore, it cannot be ruled out that the defendant defended, with the prior approval of the federal government, the imposition of crude / mineral oil imports, uses, etc., by the octroi duty. The stable octroi issued under is mentioned in the schedule. And also in the Government Gazette, Sections of the Cantons Act, 1924
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
