ABDUL RAUF versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (FEMALE)
Section 10 and 15 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application The issue of renting a landlord was that his brother had rented to a tenant (school) Tenant The tenant denied the landlord and tenant relationship. What was The school eviction application was accepted by the rent controller on payment of rent on default basis, but the appellate court rejected it on the ground that there was no relationship between the parties with the landlord and the tenant. Agreement was not available. The applicant stated that his brother (the alleged donor) had rented in 1968 and the receipt of the rent stating that the said property had been left to the defendant was suspected to be in the middle. There is no receipt to pay rent for the period. From 1968 1969 to 1987 1988, 20 years have been presented by the applicant during the trial to prove that the defendant is his tenant. The landlord applicant prepared certain invoices in connection with the payment of rent but the invoices were not receiving proper signatures, and the receipts show that the payment was made through cash, which cannot be paid. Because government payments were usually the same. The payment of rent through cross check etc. and cash was barely any weight was lifted by the applicant saying that the property was rented by his brother but at any stage of the proceedings the owner The housewife's brother did not claim it. Renting a property or issuing a receipt school is one
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
