Section 13 (d) Valuation of Illegal Weapons Evidence Evidence Failure to Receive a Ballistic Report from the Non-Participation of Private Witnesses The accused allegedly received firearms for which he had no license / license from the trial court. Sentenced the accused under section 13 (d) and sentenced him. ) In the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, the accused were taken into custody by the Station House Officer (SHO) police, along with their father and brother, who sought bribe, and so on. On refusal of the demand, fireworks were dropped on the accused who filed an application under section 491, CR PC, showing that a raiding operation took place during which the father and brother of the accused were taken into police custody. Was exported from Arrivals and departure entries were not presented to the trial court. That there were shops and hotels near the scene of the incident but no private person was requested to act as a consultant, and the allegedly recovered firearms specialist was filed under section 491, CR PC. Was not sent for request, and his father and brother were available on record but the trial court did not arrive at this aspect of the case and the trial court investigation officer examined anyone from shops and hotels near the site. Outgoing entries were not submitted before I failed. Firearms and bullets were not sent to the ballistic expert for the incident. The prosecutor, without any doubt, failed to prove his case, allowing the trial court to grant appeal, sentence and sentence.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
