Find a Lawyer

COMPANIES ORDINANCE 1984 ANDMETRO CASH AND CARRY PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus

Sections 284 and 287 consider the necessary arrangements for the approval of the scheme by the High Court on the arrangement scheme between the two companies.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI v. CENTRE FOR MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, KARACHI 2013 PTD 1
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN KATIAR v. PAKISTAN REFINERY LTD. 2013 PLD 1
• JAWAID FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS v. FOOD DEPARTMENT through Secretary Food, Government of Sindh 2013 CLC 6
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2013 PCrLJ 7
• MUHAMMAD ZAHID MAQSOOD v. UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI 2013 MLD 9
• TAJAMMUL HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 2013 YLR 11
• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, HYDERABAD 2013 PLD 25
• HUB ALI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 25

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

when you need a advocate from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes