SYEDA WAHEEDA SHAH versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Arts 218 and 199 Representative Abuse and Beating with Election Staff for a Constitutional Assembly Provincial Assembly Seat of the Election Commission Order, 2002, Arts 8 and 9E, Representative People Act (LXXXV of 1976) , Two members of the Election Commission had directed the Returning Officer to file an FIR in connection with such incident. Terms of use have been taken. The choice of the accused candidate was that without seeking the formal meeting of the five members, the unclean decision of the three members was not by any proper commission and had no legal effect, the Election Commission must act for accuracy. Was not required and the decision was always formally communicated. Its five-member commission meeting can take its decision from a simple majority of the current members, since having two members, the required majority cannot be formed. The three members had taken the impugned decision, as was the decision of the majority of the members of the commission, which would result in the direction of the two members and the effect of any action / action on the basis of it was not eliminated. Seeking a formal meeting of the five members of the commission will not invalidate an effective decision. Commission officers and employees will not be able to insist that they should come with guidance or from at least three members of the commission and commission officers. Will be bound to act in accordance with the order received by one or two members, provided that the remaining members cancel such request of the candidate on the order of the majority of the members
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
