Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM SOLANGI versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, KHAIRPUR

Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Reality Dispute Salaries, applicants' non-payment of claims were made on the job by the authorities and despite serving them only one month's salary was paid by the bank this month and this fact. Was also acknowledged by a bank representative. There was no convincing documented evidence that applicants were performing their duties on a regular basis. The constitution cannot be based on complex, contentious or contentious questions of fact, or otherwise cannot be resolved without questioning the facts and recording of the evidence for which the High Court appropriate forum for resolving complex facts. was not. Oblige the competent authority to constitute a high-powered committee to conduct a fair, transparent and impartial inquiry into the matter and to verify the authenticity and truth of the applicant's appointment orders and the competent authority to act promptly on this inquiry report. Submit a report to

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• GHULAM FAREED v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SANGI 2013 PCrLJ 117
• Syeda WAHEEDA SHAH v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 117
• DALDA FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED v. SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI 2013 PLC 118
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. ZIAULLAH CHAUDHRY 2013 CLC 119
• TARIQ SHAFI 2013 MLD 129
• MUHAMMAD FAREED v. State 2013 YLR 133
• SONERI BANK LIMITED through Jaffar Ali Khan v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and Justice Division, Pak Secretariat, Islamabad 2013 PLC 134
• SHEERAZ AHMED v. State 2013 MLD 137

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

top civil advocates from Haveli Lakha lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes