Find a Lawyer

HAIBAT versus STATE

Section 497 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Rule 302/109/2011, on the morning of the crime, the disappearance of the evidence of guilt, the water course was initiated by the FIR about 21 days late. The complainant filed the complaint directly with different versions of the incident, so the present case was a matter of more than one version. The question was whose version was the verdict in the trial. The articles were not recovered so it is revealed that the cause of death of the deceased is \ uncertain \, therefore, ocular testimony was not supported by medical evidence. Yep, the accused got bail in the circumstances. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• FIDA HUSSAIN v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION/DRAINAGE, LARKANA 2013 PLC(CS) 106
• Syed ZAHOOR HUSSAIN ZAIDI v. PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V, KARACHI 2013 PLC 110
• Syed AMANULLAH SHAH v. State 2013 YLR 110
• Mst. NEELOFAR SHAH v. OFSPACE (PVT.) LTD. 2013 CLD 114
• GHULAM FAREED v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SANGI 2013 PCrLJ 117
• Syeda WAHEEDA SHAH v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 117
• DALDA FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED v. SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI 2013 PLC 118
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. ZIAULLAH CHAUDHRY 2013 CLC 119

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

best law firms from Nowshero Feroz lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes