Find a Lawyer

TARIQ SHAFI versus

Due to lack of jurisdiction in section 371, the application for the issuance of the Letter of Administration was rejected because the deceased died at this place and his immovable property was located. The applicant believed the deceased was a common resident. At the address given at the K location and the fact that his place was dead in S and his property was in place R did not have any adverse effects on the petition before the court. Was taken and was in accordance with Section 371 of the Succession. The Act, 1925, the High Court set aside the unclean order and the trial proceeded to the trial court for a decision on the merit.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Syeda WAHEEDA SHAH v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 117
• DALDA FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED v. SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI 2013 PLC 118
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. ZIAULLAH CHAUDHRY 2013 CLC 119
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM SOLANGI v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, KHAIRPUR 2013 PLC(CS) 121
• MUHAMMAD FAREED v. State 2013 YLR 133
• SONERI BANK LIMITED through Jaffar Ali Khan v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and Justice Division, Pak Secretariat, Islamabad 2013 PLC 134
• SHEERAZ AHMED v. State 2013 MLD 137
• IRFAN ALI v. SECRETARY, EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI 2013 PLC(CS) 137

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Bolan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes