HABIB-UR-REHMAN versus VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, HYDERABAD
Sections 8, 9 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Requirement for Tenant Bonus Personal Requirement Restrictions on the Expansion of the Territory Exemption in the Payment of the Rent of the Home and Appeal by the Landlord Simultaneously for Rent Rejected by controller and lower applet. The court imposed an increase in rent under Section 9 of the tenant areas on the ground that the annual increase in rent in the rent agreement was against the law and the landlord failed to provide a description of the housing needs. The restriction of the Ordinance, 1979 was more than 10% per annum and that too, after three years, was on fair rent, which was to be determined by the tenant controller under section 8 of the Indus Rental Ordinance. In the present case, "Fair Rent" was not determined by the Rent Controller in 1979, therefore, the terms of Section 9 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 were not applicable and the agreement between the parties was in accordance with the Principal Act of Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance. Didn't have 1979 1979 In 1979, the tenant was free to move the Renaissance Premises Ordinance, section 8 of 1979, for the determination of fair rent fix, if he felt that R was a fair rent. There is no claim being made and the rent agreement clause regarding the increase in rent was not inconsistent, thus the operative tenant was mistaken in this case when not rented as per the rent agreement between the parties. The landlord was not required to give a full description of his personal use of the property. , When it was established that
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
