Section 13 (d) Illegal Weapons Definition of Evidence Not Sealed Weapons Report No Ballistic Expert Report Received The Independent witnesses who were not involved in the enmity with the police were allegedly affected by the accused and co-accused. Challenged the outpost, which he allegedly fired. The case was registered with the intention of killing two FIs in the police, one under Joint Counsel under Section 324, 354, 148 and 149, PPC and the other under Section 13 (d) of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. had gone. The FI Rupees Trial Court sentenced the accused under Section 13 (d) of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, the Weldati Joint Counsel was prepared for both the FI and both cases were heard by the same court and the trial court issued a The prosecution's evidence was denied in the case, and the weapons recovered from the suspect were not sealed or shipped to Bellstead, without giving any reason for the suspect convicted on the same evidence. And with the matter blank for the report, there is no denying that tampering with the evidence in such circumstances He was in police custody before the FIR was registered at the May trial, and the court assigned no valid reason for the trial. Prior to spying on information, he had plenty of time to make himself known as a consultant to locals and freelancers so that he could be made an advisor but that was not done. Police officers' testimony appears unnatural and untrustworthy, especially since police officers were charged with outrage. Of the trial court prosecution case
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
