SYED ARIF RAZA RIZVI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE
Section,,, Constitution and Constitution Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition The applicant dismissed was a flight steward and action was taken against him and his fellow Airhosts for carrying prohibited goods, the Inquiry Officer The applicant was convicted and dismissed by Airhosts, resulting in the dismissal of the applicant, although the accuracy of the service was also charged to Airhostas as the applicant was, however, the applicant and co-accused. The allegation was not dismissed without any evidence related to it The applicant's signature on the inventory of the ban was not, nor was it, actually asked. If the applicant had made a prohibited purchase from the duty-free shop at the airport to sign it, it would not have been difficult for the respondent corporation to obtain some material / evidence for the effect management or the captain of the aircraft, Action was taken against the applicant on the stand of, the Inquiry Officer, who was unable to conduct the inquiry, was prepared to prove the charge against the failed applicant, irreconcilable, baseless and contrary to the facts. Was the basis.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
