Find a Lawyer

KHAN MUHAMMAD versus CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-II, TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN

Section 145 Land dispute is likely to lead to the possession of the disputed property in the jurisdiction under Section 1545 of the Peace Magistrate, itself satisfied before the Magistrate before passing the order under Section 145 of the PC Had to argue that the dispute between the parties was likely to be a breach of the peace and thus for satisfaction, it had to record the evidence of the parties and without referring to the parties' merits or claims, it should listen to the parties and The matter should go accordingly. The La Magistrate should follow the statements of the parties, listen to the parties and obtain all the evidence that can be presented by the parties and, if necessary, obtain further evidence and then decide on the question of ownership. And deal with the party in the possession of the property.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ARK GARMENTS INDUSTRY (PVT.) LTD. v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 MLD 1349
• FARID VIRANI v. FEROZ VIRANI 2013 CLD 1361
• MAHBOOB AHMED SOOMRO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance 2013 MLD 1363
• ABDUL SATTAR v. State 2013 YLR 1364
• DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, SUKKUR v. KHAN MUHAMMAD 2013 MLD 1369
• Syed ARIF RAZA RIZVI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence 2013 PLC(CS) 1375
• RECORDER TELEVISION NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. v. PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2013 CLC 1376
• KHADIM HUSSAIN BHAYO v. State 2013 YLR 1382

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

how to become a advocate from Jampur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes