Find a Lawyer

MST. SAMINA AFFAQ versus MUHAMMAD JABBAR

Sections 15 and 19 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for the payment of rent and removal of tenants based on default on slumbering was allowed against the tenants ex parte tenant's argument (applicants) was That the rental controller was not allowed to provide. Tenants had the opportunity to review the property for the landlord at a time when the landlord's recording and cross-checking of the landlord by the rental controller was completed and the case was settled when the rent controller had it. Was. The landlord did not blindly rely on the words of the landlord but rather examined it and after considering all the evidence, the rent controller had approved the eviction order, so the constitutional requests were not rejected, Constitutional requests rejected

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Syed ARIF RAZA RIZVI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence 2013 PLC(CS) 1375
• RECORDER TELEVISION NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. v. PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2013 CLC 1376
• KHADIM HUSSAIN BHAYO v. State 2013 YLR 1382
• ALLAH BACHAYO alias BACHOO v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1387
• MAZHAR ALI v. State 2013 YLR 1392
• MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. SHAMSUDDIN 2013 MLD 1392
• Mst. HINA v. MUHAMMAD TARIQUE 2013 YLR 1394
• NIB BANK LIMITED v. APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED 2013 CLD 1398

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

us immigration advocates from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes