RECORDER TELEVISION NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Sections 2 (m), 19, 24, 29, 30 and 30A General Clauses Act (X of 1897), failure to operate channel license for broadcasting section 24A, cancellation of non-speech order, Pakistan in the year, 2008 The impact of the Electronic Media Regulatory Authority was granted to the appellant license to broadcast the satellite television channel and the appellant wanted to extend the channel to begin work, finally, in the year 2010, the license was granted by the authority. It was canceled on the ground that the appellant was not in a position to start the channel work. The ploy raised by the appellant was that the renewal fee was regularly paid to the authorities and the license could not be revoked. The accuracy authorities failed to find that the appellant was not in fact in a position to commence operations or lacked the necessary equipment and financing. Operational record of the channel shows that the appellant has agreed to make the channel operational provided that the appropriate frequency and location are allocated by the cable, for the purpose of operating the operators, under the circumstances, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance. The applicants of Section 30 (1) (c) of 2002, especially the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority could not justify their adoption of the Ordinance. , The 2002 order did not meet the revocation license parameters as contained in section 24A of the General Clause Act, 1897, because there was no good reason, the High Court set aside the revocation license and Directed the Authority to restore the appellant's license, under payment. Renewal Fee and in this regard
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
