Find a Lawyer

DEEN MUHAMMAD versus ABDUR RAB

Sections 15 and 16 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application to strike a tenant's eviction defense In another case of tenant's non-compliance, the rent was submitted and the tenant was instructed by the tenant. To withdraw the rent and submit it to the court tenant. Failed to comply with the concession rental order approved by the rent controller, which was specific and unclear and failed to withdraw the rent collected in any other case, and in this case the tenant also failed to submit the rent in the future. The tenant controller justified the tenant's defense temporarily the rental order and such violation could not be termed due to a misunderstanding or rent control due to a misunderstanding The defendant had properly withheld the tenant's defense because he had deliberately made a temporary rent order. Client did not. The constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Petition was denied in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Syed WAQAR HAIDER ZAIDI v. Mst. ALAM ARA BEGUM 2013 CLC 535
• SYNGENTA PAKISTAN LTD. v. S.M. ASIF 2013 PLD 536
• BAHRO MAZARI v. State 2013 YLR 543
• NAVEED ANJUM v. ALI RAZA 2013 CLC 544
• SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASHRAF D. BALOCH (PVT.) LIMITED v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 550
• MUHAMMAD YAKOOB GOPANG v. PRESIDING OFFICER, HYDERABAD 2013 PLD 551
• MANTHAR ALI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2013 PCrLJ 553
• MEDIA MAX (PVT) LTD. v. ARY COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. 2013 PLD 555

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

when you need a advocate from Jatoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes