Find a Lawyer

MEDIA MAX (PVT) LTD. versus ARY COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD.

A. VII, R 11 (a) The reason for the plaintiff's retaliatory reason for non-disclosure proceedings must be present at the institute or justification for dismissing the plaintiff on account of lack of evidence or due to poor process of proof. Will not present.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• DEEN MUHAMMAD v. ABDUR RAB 2013 MLD 549
• SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASHRAF D. BALOCH (PVT.) LIMITED v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 550
• MUHAMMAD YAKOOB GOPANG v. PRESIDING OFFICER, HYDERABAD 2013 PLD 551
• MANTHAR ALI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2013 PCrLJ 553
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, KARACHI v. ADAM SUGAR MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI 2013 PTD 556
• BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED v. MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN 2013 CLD 558
• Mst. SADAF v. SHAH NAWAZ 2013 MLD 562
• MUHAMMAD YOUNIS v. Mrs. ISMAT MEHDI 2013 CLC 562

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

family advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes