Explanation and objection to Articles 207 (3) (b) and 199 Article 207, expressing the Constitution, a person who has held the position of a High Court Judge in any court or jurisdiction in any jurisdiction. Will not solicit or take action against. In Article 207 (3) (b) of the Constitution, the question before the High Court was whether a retired High Court Judge could plead or take action in cases before the High Court, of which he was a permanent Judge. Indeed, this sentence cannot be interpreted in its jurisdiction to have any limited meaning used in Article 207 (3) (b) of the Constitution so that only those courts which are subject to the High Court shall have its term Is inside Its jurisdiction includes the full jurisdiction of the High Court, including the original jurisdiction, as well as the jurisdiction of the appellate courts that operate the High Court cannot be excluded from the scope of this sentence. In its jurisdiction, any person present in Article 207 (3) of Article 207 (3) of the Constitution actually accepts the full jurisdiction of the High Court under which the High Court acted. At the same time, the courts also said that the High Court was subordinate, and therefore, when Article 207 (3) speaks of any court, it not only referred to all the courts of subordinate jurisdiction, but also Even the courts, operating under the banner of the High Court under their original or jurisdictional constitution, Under the provisions of the institution of the High Court and all the courts which it says, only those courts which are pursuant to Article 207 (3) (b) of the Constitution may be called by the High Court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
