MUHAMMAD YAKOOB GOPANG versus PRESIDING OFFICER, HYDERABAD
Section 561 provides for a Prohibition Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 193, 384, 109 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6 (2) (k) of false evidence, extortion, theft, joint intent. To conclude, the petitioner for the trial court observed in his judgment that the petitioner / complainant and conscience had made false statements before the court under section 193, ordering the PPC to issue an order against them. The petitioner's contention was that the conscience had not filed a separate response to the notice under Section 193, PPC. , But he nevertheless adopted the reply made by him, notwithstanding that the notice issued against the adviser was withdrawn, while the notice against him was still pending, the petitioner requested that he be treated as personal. The petition is being urged, which is why it was discriminatory. No previous statement of the trial court endorsement petitioner was listed on the oath; in such cases there was nothing before the trial court that made false allegations under section 193, PPC, Applicant / Against the applicant issued to the complainant, therefore, is a misuse of the court proceedings, which cannot be allowed because the High Court invalidates the court's proceedings under Section 6161A, CRPC. There are options to prevent or prevent use. Notice of Justice Show was issued against the applicant under Section 193, PPC, and the proceedings thereafter, canceled.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
