Sections 154 and 157 Police Rules, 1934, CH XXIV, Rr 24 4 & 24 7 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition filed an FIR for Cross Version Scope Station House Officer (SHO) / Defendant Refused to file an IR for the version submitted by the complainant (applicant) on the basis that the proposed accused party had filed an FIR in connection with the same incident, and the complainant was pressing the proposed accused party. Wanted to file a false case, the complainant's convictions were the SHO's opinion before filing an FIR and filing an FIR under Section 154, CR Was out. It is the job of the investigating officer, not the SHO, and the complainant's prescription can be recorded in accordance with the law and can be investigated in accordance with the law once the complainant has notified the SHO of the crime of identification. When communicating the information, the SHO was obliged to take action. According to the law, the accused had already filed a case against the complaining party and the SHO had stated that no such incident had occurred by the complainant. In such cases, the provisions of Rules 24 4 and 24 7 Was unable to make a request. Chapter XXIV of the Police Rules, 1934 and Section 157 (b), CR PC's constitutional application was allowed; the SHO was directed to record the complainant's statement and to record such statement if If there is an unrecognizable offense, then enter the same in terms of section 154. , CR PC
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
