Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXI, RR 66, 90.67, 68 and 89 Declaration Implementing Sale / Auction Not to mention the Storage Price Issue Declaration Issue Separation of Auction / Sale on Material Non-compliance with the provisions of O XXI, RR 66, 67 and 68 required by the trial court to examine the CPC effect of the auction process. The merger between auction buyers and court auctions, as well as irregularities in property and procedure justified the inherent jurisdiction of the sale process in the execution of the property, which was located in one place and Publication of public notices under XXI was made in the FCC in the CPC newspapers. And there was no mention of the reserve price in the pro forma submitted for the auction order sheet's schedule. It did not indicate that the auction schedule was included in the execution court order, though in this publication The reserve price was mentioned, but without any authority and no determination by the execution court and the reserve price was not mentioned in the publication because it was not mentioned in the supporter court ( Auction schedule) The High Court observed that wherever there was a sale, the court arranged. The reserve price was compulsory and its absence could be fatal and it is established that in the present case no reserve price was fixed by the Executive Court and the declaration issued under O XXI, R 66, was made by the CPC Did not comply. The court, in the present case, had jurisdiction not only under O XXI, R 89, CPC. But financial institutions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
