Find a Lawyer

MALIK TAHIR AYUB versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI

Section 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Petition filed by the applicant pursuant to the marriage dissolution case filed by the Power of Attorney and retrieval of dowry articles I cannot be an attorney appearing as a witness In another applicant's case, the written statement was filed by the applicant (principal) or presented as a witness who was authorized by the executor. Of which he was to perform only the duties of which he was specially empowered. The power of attorney had to be carefully handled and it expanded the matters involved. The special option for the divorce case to be executed was to require that it be limited to the dissolution of the marriage and which could not be used for other cases or proceedings. The petitioner's lawyer was not authorized to form part of the lawsuit to dissolve the marriage, nor did the applicant's statement for the recovery of the Dover nor the statement made by the applicant appear in the case. (Principal) statement may be considered and will be construed as testimony presented by the relevant party.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• Haji ZAHID SAEED v. ASIF BROTHERS 2015 CLD 40
• Ch. SHAMSHAIR ALI v. KHALID MAHMOOD 2015 YLR 47
• MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR RIAZ v. KALSUM TUFAIL 2015 PLD 50
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2015 MLD 54
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2015 PCrLJ 58
• Syed IMRAN HASSAN GILLANI v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, RAWALPINDI /ISLAMABAD 2015 PLD 61
• JUNAID JAMSHED v. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SICENCES 2015 CLC 65
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB DOGAR v. Mst. NIAZI 2015 YLR 65

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Piaro goth lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes