SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. versus CH. MUHAMMAD ZAHID
SS4, 2 (h) and 33 Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002) Section 11 of the Consumer Court Manufacturers jurisdiction, appreciating the complaint against the Gas Supply Company for excessive billing, and the claimant Gas Supply The company invalidated the consumer court order. Permission to be filed by the complainant in connection with excessive gas billing was allowed, the manufacturer of any product mentioned in Sections 2 (h) and 4 of the Defendant Gas Supply Company Punjab Product Protection Act, 2005 And the defendant was merely a gas supplier and / or its seller; therefore, increasing the liability for excessive billing has the full meaning of Section 4 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005. The Consumer Court did not intend to be a special court, nor could the General Jurisdictional Court raise the issue of excessive gas billing as it did not fall under its jurisdiction and the Punjab Consumer Protection Act of 2005 The Spirit did. Such incidents are not completed. The complainant also had alternatives under the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance 2002 which he did not avail and the affected court order was set aside and accordingly the appeal was allowed. was given.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
