Section 12 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XVII, R 1 (3) Contract Specific Performance Suits Reasonable Relief Scope Trial Court Due to Plaintiff's Non-Payment of Remaining Sale Pursuant to its Order Case dismissed. Valid Discrimination for Specific Performance was an arbitrary relief for parties to the suit for specific work and matters of conduct were more relevant when the parties were willing to make their own agreements at the time of contract. And at the time of the decree approved in the plaintiff, the balance was not paid by the claimant until the deadline set in the contract for sale to the plaintiff. If the remaining value is paid within 10 days, he has no objection Was. In order for the plaintiff to approve the injunction but the plaintiff failed to make the same payment when the plaintiff did not attempt to execute the sale deed by paying the defendant, he would lie. The trial court had to look to see if a party was entitled to a specific performance order on equity basis or if the plaintiff had delayed the trial due to an error on his behalf and he paid the balance despite the confession statement. The defendant deliberately refused to pay the remainder of the sale price which was necessary for the progression of this case and failed to comply with the trial court's co-owners' order in this case and their Make a statement that he had no objection. If the balance was paid in the transfer of this amount, then the equity as well as fairness would lie in favor of the defendant and the trial court, along with the plaintiff's trial.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
