A. VIII, rejecting the R11 planter scope and deciding the application under OVII, R 11, CPC, the court was legally required to restrict itself to the plaint cases and accepted the same. Should go because the court may hold that even the defense documents were brought on record by the defense aspect, but such an exception was subject to the extent to which the defense or the document was deemed unconstitutional. It should go before it is brought before the court for a cause / case to be decided by the court and that was it. The decision of the court; who determined the rights and obligations that the plaintiff's refusal meant to bury his suit at its inception, even, at the end of the day, fails due to a legal restriction.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
