Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM YASEEN versus STATE


Section 497 (2) Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Occupation of Illegal Weapons Bail, Failure report already attached in the FIR report attached to the Ballistic Expert found no enmity with the police challan. A police party earlier presented to the court was arrested on suspicion of alleged firing, and two separate FIs were registered against the accused in the possession of unlicensed Kalashnikovs. , Section 324 and 353, section 324 under section 13 (d) of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, under PPC and another (current FIR). And under 353, the accused had already been granted bail for the FIR, all PPC prosecution witnesses were police officers who were not sent for report to a ballistic expert for allegedly removing Kalashnikov from the accused. There was no question of tampering with the prosecution's evidence. The accused also accused the police of enmity. The matter was one of further investigations.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.