The alleged damages act was enacted in 1984 and the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005 was not serious, but the complainant became aware of it in the year 2011; And dismissed the complaint filed under 4. Observing that the accused had been occupying the land since 1984, while the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 was enforced in 2005 and had no previous effect. Was the crime of illegally seizing property since 1984. As contemplated under Section 3 (1) of the Unlawful Disposal Act, 2005, if the present offense had occurred long before the introduction of the Unlawful Dispossession Act, 2005, the above offense was proved to be an offense. Since such a trial court had come to the conclusion that the complaint was not intact, there was no prejudice to the said act. Application for tive impact review was rejected
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
