Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Sub-Maturity Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (b) and 9 (c) possession of drug bail, grant of borderline case, delay in sending false samples for examination, police report The arrested suspect was arrested on patrol duty and received 1250 grams of hashish. During the investigation, 1250 grams of marijuana was sent to the chemical examiner for report, but the chemical inspector received only 1200 grams, no such difference of 50 grams was made clear by the prosecution prima fee, yet during the trial. To be determined, whether the crime occurred under Section 9 (b) or 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, the present case was a borderline case; all the prosecution witnesses were policemen, thus molesting the accused. There was no question. Prohibited material with evidence was sent to the Chemical Investigation Office six days after the registration of the case, through which a constitutional application was also filed against the police authorities. A relative of the accused was not denied any false allegations. The suspects were admitted on bail under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
