Section 31 has been obtained after the issuance of a notice under Section 31 of the Smuggling Act for the Prevention of Smuggling through Property Smuggling Act 1977. In the year 1993, property from a company whose managing director was a drug baron was registered under the subject property under the registered sub-deed of lease in 1993, while a notice was issued under section 31 of the Trafficking Prevention Act 1977. In 1996, the court issued a notice to the drug baron and his accomplices, but the notice presented to the respondents / buyer was not only compulsory but also practical because he was the owner of the registered title as the respondent / buyer. No notice was taken on this, so he appeared in court and after the DI was suspected, the court issued the property to the record The follower of the record did not show any contact or business between the respondent / buyer and the accused and his accomplices. The prosecutor has to collect the concrete evidence to attach the defendant to the buyer and the company affiliated with the company. Currently the time. The Baron Prosecution also did not collect any evidence to prove that the respondent / buyer was involved in the drug smuggling business or that he had purchased the real estate through real estate or any other illegal means. It may be that he does not have enough resources. Appeal to buy the subject property was dismissed in due course
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
