Proof of intoxication in Sections 9 (b) and 9 (c) of the definition of suspicion The change of sentence from Section 9 (c) to 9 (b) of the Drug Subjects Act 1997 was not sent separately from each exported packet. The effect was to recover only the drug believed to be of the same quantity, from which the sample and base packet, heroin, were recovered from the accused weighing 3kg. Sentenced under section 9 (c). It was that only three samples of 10 grams in each of the three packets were sent for chemical examination. That if it had the weight of 20 packets (39kg) exported from it divided by the weight of 20 packets, then each packet weighed about 200 grams, and since only three packets were sent samples, Therefore, the total weight recovered should be considered 600 grams of heroin. In such cases, the crime is used under Section 9 (b) of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 and is not under section 9 (c) of the Act. Admittedly, only three samples (10 grams each) out of three packets, each packet weighs 200 grams. , Was taken for chemical examination and confirmed the fact from the chemical examination report, in the circumstances of this case, his conviction in Sections 9 (c) to 9 (b) of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 In connection with the change in the accused's confession, it was found true that the accused had already undergone about four years' imprisonment and had repented and did not promise to repeat such crime in future. The accused was also prepared to pay a fine of Rs 100,000 imposed on him by the trial court. Contested by trial court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
