Sections 324, 353 and 34 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Convention of Convention (10 of 1984), Article 133 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 10 Conduct of prosecution, fine, assault or criminal force for the prevention of public servants. Efforts to pay for their duties, joint intentions, valuing evidence from the possession of illegal weapons Cross-examination by a non-accused accused himself fired with the intention of killing the alleged police party. He was, however, later arrested and taken into custody. Unlicensed weapons trial The trial court found the defendants guilty under Sections 242424, 3353 and 34, PPC, despite the fact that they were not represented by defense lawyers, and some witnesses themselves. He was examined, not examined due to the absence of witnesses illegally prosecuted. With regard to the accused by the defense lawyer, therefore, the evidence entered could have no significance and no conviction could be safely disclosed on the basis of such evidence where the accused's lawyer The prosecution's testimony was not cross-examined by the trial court asking the accused to examine experienced police officers for whom they had no clear experience. This was the way the trial court reflected the abortion of justice, the appeal was allowed, the conviction and sentence recorded by the trial court was set aside and the trial was re-scheduled in the trial court so that the accused persons Provide a suitable opportunity for the lawyer to engage. Prosecution witness
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
