GHULAM MUSTAFA versus CHANCELLOR, MEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, JAMSHORO AT KARACHI
Section 5 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Benefits Intelligence Petitioner It was alleged that the University employee had committed fraud and provided fake admission to two students, the applicant had earlier retired from the job but remanded. However, the action was taken against him under removal from the service (Special Powers) Sindh Ordinance, 2000, and it was reversed in the Basic Pay Scale 17 to 16 which the applicant had raised that required retirement. He was set aside on remand for sentencing and will continue to receive benefits from the service, which is exempt from employment. He deserved it. In the event of the applicant's claim of validity, they should seek benefits reimbursement for the period in which they must retire, especially when they were not honorably discharged. There was a misunderstanding and the petitioner did not challenge the order by filing appropriate action before the competent authority. Chose not to pressure the earlier application in which the match was found Relief was sought The applicant did not show any valid reason to prove that the applicant was in the prescribed period before the appropriate forum. The appropriate action against the order approved by the authorities was prevented. No legal basis was raised in the jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution's petitioner, nor was any illegal identification identified in the order passed by the authorities, therefore, the High Court refused to intervene. Petition dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
