Sections 302, 365A, 440, 343 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (e) convictions for kidnapping, ransom, mischief, false imprisonment, joint intent, confession of terror act. Regarding the female accused of the statement, no evidence against the accused is available, the confessional statement was withdrawn by the accused in his statement under section 342, 6 days after the CCP arrested the accused. Was recorded and the relevant magistrate completely negated the prerequisites of the law. Recording the confessional statement, Kansar had specifically requested that he be treated as abusive by the relevant Section H and confessed to his cousin. It cannot be said, in the circumstances that the confessional statement was voluntary, no direct evidence was available against the accused, which could be considered sufficient to legally prosecute the accused as the prosecution surreptitiously suspected the case. Had failed to do. The culprits and the wrong decisions were against the principles of the criminal administration, it was not sustainable under the law, the unclean verdict was kept aside and the accused was acquitted of the charges.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
