Section 2 (d) Interpretation Code (XLV of 1860) Sections 467, 468 and 471 Ordinance of Banking Companies (LVII of 1962) Section 7 Explanation of the Special Court of Criminal Orders 1984 (2) in relation to banks ? Banks) Scheduled crime, jurisdiction and jurisdiction The banking company failed the order of the Special Court (Banks), whereby its criminal complaints against the respondents were dismissed under Section 203, CR PC. Because of which these complaints do not fall within the definition of scheduled crime. In connection with the banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, the Bank of Containment in 1984 was that the respondents seeking financial assistance from the bank manipulated documents from the bank, so that they could appear before the bank. He has fulfilled his duty and delivered him. Their mortgaged property from the bank's charge, and the same matters were defined under the Definition of Crime under the Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984 and so on. The follower of the manipulative documents has revealed that the manipulation was done with the sole intention of preventing the bank from recovering outstanding dues and securing financing facility, which was found in PPC Special Sections 467, 468 and 471. Comes in circle. The court (the banks) misled itself by saying that such manipulation does not indicate that the accused had allegedly committed fraud or manipulation in connection with or in connection with the bank's business. Committed, and it gave the word business a very narrow meaning. The Bank Special Court (Banks) erred by saying that its jurisdiction only extended to cases where
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
