Find a Lawyer

NADEEM ASIF versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 murder convictions, joint intention bail, denial of accused, co-accused and convict were traveling in the same car when some unknown persons opened fire on the deceased and killed him. done. The accused and the co-accused killed the accused, the accused was specifically named in the FIR The co-accused confessed to his crime and said that he had committed the murder of the victim on the provocation of the accused Medical. The version supported the prosecution case under which the car was used in the crime before the police had sufficient evidence linking the accused to the commission of the crime according to the accused's request bail was dropped accordingly.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Mst. TASLEEM v. State 2013 MLD 1331
• Haji JAM v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through D.C.O. TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN 2013 CLC 1332
• RAHEEM DAD v. Mir HASSAN 2013 YLR 1337
• ALLIED BANK LIMITED v. SIKANDAR ALI 2013 CLD 1339
• BUDHO v. State 2013 YLR 1349
• ARK GARMENTS INDUSTRY (PVT.) LTD. v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 MLD 1349
• FARID VIRANI v. FEROZ VIRANI 2013 CLD 1361
• MAHBOOB AHMED SOOMRO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, Ministry of Finance 2013 MLD 1363

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

tax advocates from Sakardu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes