Section 302, 324, 337H (2) and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), sections 6 and 7 of the Contempt Amd, acts of harassment or negligence, acts of terrorism, injuries caused by the definition of common intention. The complainant of the evidence clearly stated that the accused in the court was not the witness of the prosecutor who said that the section HA had fired on the victim with his Kalashnikov, who was on the spot. There was no fire at the time of the incident. The witness also did not involve the accused involved in the commission of the crime. The evidence to remain was natural and nothing was recovered from the accused's possession. The witnesses of the incident did not include the persons involved in the commission of the crime. In the trial case, the court failed to appreciate the case, and according to the law of Burden, the evidence relied on the prosecution to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt, but he failed to prosecute the same. I failed to set up my case against the accused by the court charged, sentenced and sentenced And, it was set aside and he was acquitted, in these circumstances,
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
