The prosecution's witnesses testified against the approval of the section 497 (2) Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/109/34 Qutal-ud, attempt to compel Qutel Om, bail of a bailiff, and further investigation. Version not supported. The accused was in custody at the time of his presence and had not met with any of his co-accused to commit the crime, which can be charged only and only by the trial court, if there is any concrete evidence in this regard. Will be brought on record Initially, the accused was not challaned as an accused and his name was shown in column no.2 with blue ink to indicate the evidence, and he was subsequently arrested in section 227. The accused was included as an accused only after the application was filed by the prosecution. The very next day, filed by the CR PC, without providing any opportunity for a hearing to the accused investigating officer in the High Court, it was expressly stated that the prosecution had no evidence to add hi against the accused. Is. Under Section 497 (2), whenever there was a need for further deliberation with the commission of a crime case against the accused, CCP Bell was presented to the accused in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
