It was time to confirm the defendant's accusation against the accused in the section 497 (2) and 526 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 322 murder conviction, further investigation granting that the accused was with the victim. Committed rape. And his photos were well received from cell phones to the suspects before his Victim's body was killed. Investigation into the case revealed that the victim's family was suspected of having illicit relations with the suspects. Who was murdered by his own family. The victim's post-mortem report indicated that her death occurred around 11am, while the FIR claimed that it happened around 8am, and before the arrest of the suspects. The trial court denied these observations. The victim, therefore, must move this case to another court. The complaining party believed that they did not kill the victim for allegedly having illicit relations with the accused, because if that were the case, both the victim and the accused were killed under the tradition of Caro. The complaining party's controversy about Crow Carey didn't make any sense because it would only be relevant to say that if only one was killed and not both, this story should not be admitted. At the time of death, the usual way of determining the time of death was related to the measurement of body temperature and the state of hardness. ortis When at rest, the body was not in environmental temperature but either increased or decreased in temperature, according to which
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
