Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD AHMED SHAD versus PERVEZ AKHTAR

Section 5 advised the parties to represent that the plaintiff's trial was dismissed for trial, the matter became the responsibility of the lawyer and the client was not obliged to follow his case Advocate should be informed that the plaintiff was not entitled to arbitrary relief for the case The petition for rehabilitation was dismissed pending trial, and in the circumstances, \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• RABB COFFEE HOUSE v. MUHAMMAD BAKHSH & SONS 2013 MLD 239
• MIRAN alias MIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2013 PCrLJ 244
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE QURESHI v. ZAHIR HUSSAIN JAFRI 2013 PLD 245
• SHAIKH MUHAMMAD v. State 2013 YLR 248
• TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI v. ABDULLAH SUGAR MILLS LIMITED (DEPALPUR) 2013 PLD 254
• ABDUL HAFEEZ v. State 2013 YLR 255
• AFAQ AHMED KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 258
• Mst. ISHRAT ZAIDI v. SABIR HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI 2013 YLR 262

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

family advocate from Shahpur Chakar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes