Sections 39, 42 and 54 of the document cancellation, declaration and injunction discrimination evidence of civil and criminal proceedings. The trial court also raised by the appellate court that the defendant had filed a criminal case related to the plot which he was acquitted in. The legal standard of proof in the civil and criminal cases was quite different. Was. See only the possibility of fact, while in criminal proceedings, the prosecution had to prove beyond reasonable doubt the alleged crime and if there was any doubt, the accused was entitled to his benefit, not as a matter of grace or privilege but of truth. Accordingly, any unlawful, irregular or weak trial court, ignoring the original status of the municipal corporation, was shown in the judgment as part of the street / road, the defendant. Ali was also allotted to the High Court to interfere with the trial court's decision at any time under the amended jurisdiction. Denied and the appeal was properly dismissed by the lower appellate court. Revision rejected in circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
