Section 417 (2A) appeals against acquittal unless the trial court intended to acquit the accused, the evidence on record could not be supported, or unless the impugned verdict was false. Does not prove. The appellate court will not interfere with the acquittal, unless the misrepresentation of evidence, violation of legal provisions, judicial defects; the verdict of breach was established in view of its contradiction; The notion of innocence, which was reinforced by the trial court's ruling on acquittal, has the advantage of being viewed by the trial court. If the testimony in the testimony was to be reasonably possible and even a balanced view was possible, the appellate court should not disturb the finding of the record recorded by the trial court; the appellate court should give proper weight and consideration to the trial. Should. The possibility of innocence in favor of the witnesses and the accused High Court shall not exercise the jurisdiction under Section 417, CR PC, unless the trial court's decision is misleading, wholly illegal. And no other verdict can be given because of the evidence, except that the accused was guilty or completely misrepresented in order to prove a misunderstanding of justice. Disagreement over the definition of evidence was not a good place to keep it from getting worse. Only on the re-evaluation of the evidence did it result in interference, it resulted in the acquittal of the court accused, the main test seen in such cases was the investigation under the searchlight above. Afterwards, this intervention should be explored. Completely artificial, startling
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
