ABID HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Article 199 According to the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Martial Law Order [CMLA No s] No. 77 which was amended by the Material Law Order [CMLA] s (5 of 1977) Petitioner Laches Condition filed a lawsuit late. Respect for this property was claimed on the basis of a contract to sell in its favor, which was pending, when the first information report (FIR) was filed against the applicant's complainant. I was alleged to have been illegally occupied by the applicant. The property, and subsequently the applicant, was charged and sentenced under the Martial Law Order as amended by the Materials Law Order [CMLA], with no 77 applicants, In the present constitutional petition, praying that the conviction be declared illegal, the charges against him under the Martial Law Order [CMLA No] No. 77 (as amended) do not fall into the categories; A valid order of sentence against the applicant was passed by the Military Court on 28 12 1985. And the recent constitutional petition, requesting a ban, was applied only after the 24-hour interval, which was filed for contempt of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, stated that she was 74 years old and He is carrying an illegal burden. It did not state anything other than a sentence because the applicant did not approach the court within a period of 24 years. The constitutional petition faced larceny, and it was dismissed under circumstances. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
