Sections 3 and 13 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Clause 103 Arms Retrieval Evidence Testimony Benefits of Suspicion The forensic report, the defendant's value was found guilty and sentenced to joint recovery of pistols recovered from a backward area, Without detecting the nature of the weapon, the convict cannot be punished under Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 ballistic expert can only determine the nature of the weapon and whether the weapon is working or not. If it was not in the state then it can be assumed that the ballistic expert did not fall under the metallic police office as a piece of metal. There is no evidence available on the record as to who made the first information for the recovery of the pistols, the alleged pistols were jointly recovered from the jungle, so the evidence for recovery was not secure, depending on the trial court. To be done Since the lower appellate court failed to consider the evidence available on the record and the investigation was conducted dishonestly, the whole case of the prosecution proved to be a suspicious weakness of the mind to raise a reasonable doubt about the truth of the allegations. That the High Court sentenced and convicted the accused and he was acquitted of the charge was allowed to review the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
