MUHAMMAD KASHIF versus KARACHI DOCK LABOUR BOARD THROUGH CHAIRPERSON
Section 2 (xxv), 56 (1) (d) and 69 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Benefit from a settlement under a particular settlement or loss of benefit Employees believed that the benefit was once a particular Was given under the slum, it could not be. Disqualification or loss of a case led to the termination of the dispute, as a settlement note in the current case, between a comic Beijing agent representing all employees working on one side of the storage. Was a document by the way. And on the other hand, under the terms of Section 66 of the Employer and Industrial Relations Act, 2008, it was binding on all employees that the law protected the settlement in the settlement even though it was a private contract, but the enforcement of it by law mechanism Was provided. In the present case, the settlement of the matter by law was a contract between the parties, for which the legislature had bound it not only to the employer, but also to the heirs, successors, or employers. Current and future workers' law also provided partial results, if any contract was violated by either party, collective bargaining agent and employer as a result of any agreement between the parties involved. The settlement, which was significantly rational from every angle, as the industrial environment and the commercial establishment operating in the business environment and business environment have constantly changed their strategy. And the collective bargaining agent was given the freedom to settle the issue, at least by law. And then the law also provided a period for settlement
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
