ANJUMAN FALAH-E-BAHBOOD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Former employees of the Reglin 17 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 and 54 suit declarations, interim injunctions and injunctions for loss, residential rental, Pakistan. The Telecommunications Company Limited (PTCL), which was using the plaintiff's complaint after the retirement of the company, was that they were entitled to a pension, but PTCL stopped them in lieu of rent collection. Who was a legitimate plaintiff who retired in the ordinary course. Retaining their occupied flats after a period of six months, they then had to pay a rent of 11% per cent for a pension or standard rent, of which the PTCL was unable to state that Whether the standard fare was reported. By this, there were two separate and distinct concepts of salary and pension for the plaintiffs and they were introduced in the definition of separate separation (Regln 17 01 (b) Service Rolls, Ltd., Pakistan Telecommunication Cation Company Limited). 1996) Nothing was contained in Regulation 17 of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited Service Rules 1996, as the PTCL is allowed to penalize any such plaintiff against the pension payable to such plaintiffs. Adjust. Receiving so much money, she can get her treatment elsewhere unless the plaintiff was entitled, unless the contrary shows nothing, the pension must be paid to the plaintiffs, to a greater or lesser degree. (Depending on the specific circumstances of each) Inequality faces pension payments Such injuries and injuries are considered to materially affect their lives.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
