Find a Lawyer

KASHIF ANWAR versus DISTRICT JUDGE, HYDERABAD

Section 15 Law In Evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 117 and 120 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for removal of default to tenants in payment of tenants; Was given The lower appellate court upheld the rent payment and eviction order by the tenant. Non-payment of rent was a negative fact and if the landlord appeared and stated that he had not received the rent for a particular period, it would be sufficient to remove the burden. Under the law, it was pressurized and then the burden was transferred to the tenant to confirm that he paid the rent or paid the tender. The only exception can be exempt where the landlord recognizes non-issuance of rent receipts under constitutional jurisdiction, as well as refuses to interfere. The following two exclusions were dismissed in the court seeking the facts and the eviction order passed against the tenants' constitutional petition.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• MUHAMMAD YOUSUF v. Mst. MABEEIA 2013 CLC 450
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. Mst. KHURSHEED BEGUM 2013 YLR 454
• Mst. NOOR KHATOON v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2013 CLD 463
• ANJUMAN FALAH-E-BAHBOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLC(CS) 465
• PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT MUMTAZ COLLEGE, KHAIRPUR v. BADARUDDIN 2013 MLD 470
• EVERLUCK ENTERPRISES v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division (FBR), Islamabad 2013 PTD 471
• KHAISTA MEER v. State 2013 PCrLJ 474
• PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY v. SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs. Zeeshan Fatima 2013 CLC 476

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

famous high court advocate from Piplan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes