Section 302 (b) Convention of Conviction (10 of 1984), Article 129 on the withholding of evidence of accused witnesses, the accused accused of appreciating evidence (appellant) accused of murdering his wife (deceased) Who had divorced her before. The alleged murder was found in a house, the door closed inside the trial court as soon as it was convicted under Section 302 (b) and the accused sentenced, the PPC's accuracy of the unexpected incident The matter cannot be falsely accused of a dispute between the parties to the general testimony of the parties to be dismissed in the statements of the prosecution witnesses and the alleged evidence regarding the location of the arrest of the accused and the alleged weapons related to the recovery of the alleged weapons. About 30 months after the incident, the accused was recovered and not wrapped / sealed. The chemical examiner's cell was not sealed or sent for examination, nor was the serologist sent for examination and reported that the prosecution withheld the best available evidence of the material witnesses that led to this idea. That they do not support the prosecution (Section 129 of the law testimony 1984, 1984). The fact that the victim was killed in the house by the door closed, do not appeal to the intellect, because the prosecutor There was no explanation as to how a person can knock on the door after committing the murder; the accused divorces the victim. Was, therefore, in no way justified by the evidence of her testimony. The last time the suspect was seen in front of the house, he recorded a delay of 15 days
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
